A Marine’s View of the Major Media in Iraq

Interesting article by writer Eric M. Johnson, a Marine Corps Reservist on the Washington Post’s Iraq coverage (if it can be called that).

Don’t take my word for it that the Post?s reporting is substandard and superficial. Take the word of Philip Bennett, the Post’s assistant managing editor for foreign news. In a surprisingly candid June 6 piece, he admits that “the threat of violence has distanced us from Iraqis.” Further, “we have relied on Iraqi stringers filing by telephone to our correspondents in Baghdad, and on embedding with the military. The stringers are not professional journalists, and their reports are heavy on the simplest direct observation.” Translation: we are reprinting things from people we barely know, from a safe location dozens of miles away from the fighting.

UPDATE: The article was also published in the NY Post on Saturday, 7.3.2004.

The Decline of “Old Media”

James Cramer writes about Old Media Giant Viacom’s difficulties:

Viacom SOS. No, to find out why Viacom?s stock sank to the 52-week-low list, all you need to do is look to the 52-week-high list, where the winners are: video games, satellite radio, video-on-demand, and Internet search engines. Those are the companies with the better models, the better technology that has, in an incredibly short period of time, stolen massive amounts of the fuel that powered Battleship Viacom: the viewers themselves.

Journalism vs Advertising at the LA Times

Tribune owned LA Times recently announced layoffs, just after winning a couple of Pulitzer prizes according to this story by Jacques Steinberg.

“Look at USA Today; how many Pulitzers have they won?” Mr. Janedis added, singling out the flagship of the Gannett chain, which has yet to win one. “But they sell a lot of advertising and get good rate increases.”

The article also compares major publisher cashflow margins (from Banc of America Investment Securities):

Lee publishes the local Wisconsin State Journal and co-owns the federally sanctioned monopoly (newspaper joint operating agreement: whereby overhead and advertising are shared among two or more “competitors”): Capitol Newspapers.

Big Media & Politics

OnPoint’s Tom Ashbrook interviewed NBC’s Tim Russert last Wednesday. I listened to a bit of this interview while running errands.
One segment, stuck: Russert described a recent Oval Office visit where the President hosted some baseball greats, and invited Russert and his son to participate. Ashbrook correctly asked Russert if this was an example of a cozy insider relationship (I’m paraphrasing) and therefore, can one be objective in covering politicians. Russert insisted that he of course, can……
This is a great example of a major problem today: the cozy relationships between major media and the political establishment. There’s also this: Meeting the press and surviving it; which describes Russert’s recent interview with Colin Powell. Powell’s press aide pulled the camera away when Russert evidently broke the interview’s ground rules.

Tuning out the Media

Dot Com era Billionaire and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban on why we’re tuning out the media…

We are now in an era where media searches for stories that will generate media coverage of the story. Stories are written not for the value they bring the readers, viewers or listeners, but rather the volume of coverage they will bring.
The question I had then, is the same question I have now? What is the goal of these media outlets? How do they define what is ?newsworthy.? It sure appears to me that the newsmedia has evolved from ?all the news that is fit to print? to ?How much free publicity can we get from this story??

Thanks to Glenn Reynolds who correctly states: “They’re churning out Granadas and Chevettes and telling us that we’re idiots for complaining.”

Battle of Information & Ideas


Verlyn Klinkenborg nicely summarizes recent news in the recording industry’s battle against file sharing:

But this isn’t just a legal battle, of course. It’s a battle of information and ideas. A new book from Lawrence Lessig called “Free Culture” makes a forceful, cogent defense of many forms of file sharing. And ? perhaps worst of all from the industry’s perspective ? a new academic study prepared by professors at Harvard and the University of North Carolina concludes, “Downloads have an effect on sales which is statistically indistinguishable from zero.” This directly counters recording industry claims that place nearly all the blame for declining CD sales on illegal file sharing.